Created attachment 128974 [details] Cut down odt file showing greater line spacing. Documents created in LO5.1.4 have greater line spacing when opened in LO5.2.3.3 causing page text to overflow and corrupt layout. The odt file attached is a larger file cut down and saved in LO 5.2.3.3. The pages to look at are 3,4,5. The PDF PT252-PT253manualhm52cutAOO.pdf shows how the text looks with LO 5.1.4 and AOO 4.1.2. The PDF PT252-PT253manualhm52cutLO5233.pdf shows how the text looks with LO 5.2.3.3 Workaround, set proportional line spacing 98% in paragraph style.
Created attachment 128975 [details] Representation of correct line spacing.
Created attachment 128976 [details] Representation of incorrect line spacing produced by LO5.2.3.3.
With the sample ODT, if I simply edit the Heading 3 style and set the spacing above to 0.15" from the 0.16" listed it also reverts. I would be less inclined to adjust the proportional spacing--and it is entirely possible that rather than a font rendering issue (which would control the proportional font) it is a document canvas issue in placing lines of text. It would be helpful if you were to dump your test document from 5.1.4 to file ODF (i.e. .fodt), and then the same document opened _and saved_ once in 5.2.3 also saved to file ODF (.fodt). Then we can compare the actual structure of each.
Let me please apologise in advance. I cut the file down from original in 5.2.3 as I no longer have LO5.1.4 with which the original file was created. I will upload the original, created in 5.1.4, formatting correctly in 5.1.4 and AOO 4.1.2.
Sorry, can't upload the original, too big, 22 megs. Also can't produce the .fodt from anything earlier than 5.2.3.3 until I revert back. .odt https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByFEFUXgJhGkZ0ZQekRrY1dqeG8 .pdf https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByFEFUXgJhGkcEdTYTBqRVU5dFE When opening with 5.2.3.3 I get growth on page 1 flowing to 2. The PDF above shows what the file should look like. Then noticeable at the PDF references P16, bottom P26 (6.2.3), bottom P27 (6.3.6), bottom P29 (6.4.4). And yes, it could be the heading style spacing throwing out the layout different versions of LO applying different spacing.
Created attachment 128997 [details] Screenshot view with four versions I can't a difference with: Versión: 5.0.6.2 (x64) Id. de compilación: b3fbfa99158a1030fb79f0ba72b6851afc3c7895-GL Configuración regional: es-ES (es_ES) Versión: 5.1.6.1 (x64) Id. de compilación: f3e25ec0581f5012f54d8810dcddd5824f4ee374 Subprocesos de CPU: 1; Versión de SO: Windows 6.19; Renderizado de IU: predeterminado; Configuración regional: es-ES (es_ES); Calc: CL Version: 5.2.3.3 (x64) Build ID: d54a8868f08a7b39642414cf2c8ef2f228f780cf CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.19; UI Render: default; Locale: es-ES (es_ES); Calc: group Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 All are different of what is supposed right.
This problem occurred after updating to 5.2.3.3. From comment 6 it may not be a software issue but a file changed in the update. The document was previously edited on 2 different machines, both with LO5.1.4, neither exhibiting the problem. Let me see if I can revert back to a stable situation where the document displays and produces a PDF correctly.
Given comment 7 I'm tossing this into NEEDINFO so the the OR can get a stable environment and provide greater detail on what we need to look for and how we can confirm. Mark as UNCONFIRMED when it's ready to be looked at again.
This is best. I have had some feedback that the line spacing of the text in the bullet points is varying but will add information when this can be reliably reproduced.
I believe this may now be Bug https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92657 Trying to confirm.
Dear Bug Submitter, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping-20170531
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 92657 ***