Summary: | Allow grouping of bibliographic citations | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | ericdthrift |
Component: | Writer | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
Status: | NEW --- | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | jbfaure, robinson.libreoffice |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.0 all versions | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 101258 |
Description
ericdthrift
2014-09-08 13:11:35 UTC
Hmm, editing a field is contradictory because a field is intended to be automatically updated. If it is manually modified, it is not a field anymore. That said, I agree that citation engine in LibreOffice should be able to group citations like "see [Smith 2012] and [Smith 2013]" in "see [Smith 2012, 2013]" or something like that. Well, now, bibliography module is not really maintained since several years. Already in the OOo time it was intended to remove this feature and use Zotero instead (Firefox extension + LibreOffice extension). Zotero (LibreOffice extension) has powerful options to make citations, you should give it a try. Best regards. JBF (In reply to ericdthrift from comment #0) > For example, if we have the keys [Smith 2012] > and [Smith 2013], we may need to create citations such as "Smith (2012, > 2013) ..." in addition to the basic citation "(Smith 2012)". Such formatting > is not currently possible. (In reply to Jean-Baptiste Faure from comment #1) > That said, I agree that citation engine in LibreOffice should be able to > group citations I agree as well. Seems like a reasonable enhancement. > Well, now, bibliography module is not really maintained since several years. > Already in the OOo time it was intended to remove this feature and use > Zotero instead (Firefox extension + LibreOffice extension). Zotero > (LibreOffice extension) has powerful options to make citations, you should > give it a try. So, two pieces here: 1) There's a reasonable enhancement request here, so Severity -> enhancement Status -> NEW 2) If the bibliography module is heading towards removal, then pointing people at Zotero seems like a fine policy. That being said, the module isn't gone yet, so it seems reasonable to keep this bug report open. |