Bug 77078

Summary:	"Reverse Axis" does not work for Secondary Axes
Product:	LibreOffice	Reporter:	John Perez <perez.johnangelo>
Component:	Chart	Assignee:	Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs>
Status:	RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Severity:	normal
Priority:	medium
Version:	4.2.2.1 release
Hardware:	x86-64 (AMD64)
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Crash report or crash signature:		Regression By:
Bug Depends on:
Bug Blocks:	90486
Attachments:	ODP slide where the bug is found. ODP slide where the bug is found.

Description John Perez 2014-04-05 08:43:57 UTC

Created attachment 96936 [details]
ODP slide where the bug is found.

OVERVIEW
In formatting axes on a Chart element, the "Reverse Axis" function does not work for secondary axes, but works for primary axes. In the case of the attached presentation, I need the primary axis (Dilation) to be in normal order, that is 0 at the bottom and 10 at the top. On the other hand, I need the secondary axis (Station) to be in reverse order, that is +5 at the bottom and -5 at the top.

STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1) Open the attached file.
2) Make the Chart editable by double-clicking the object.
3) Right click on the secondary axis
4) "Format Axis" then "Scale" tab
5) Check "Reverse direction"
6) "OK"

ACTUAL RESULTS: The chart remains the same.

EXPECTED RESULTS: The chart's secondary axis should reverse.

BUILD INFORMATION: version 4.2.3.3 Build: 420m0 on Ubuntu 13.10

Comment 1 John Perez 2014-04-05 08:45:28 UTC

Created attachment 96937 [details]
ODP slide where the bug is found.

Comment 2 Dominique Boutry 2014-04-08 08:53:23 UTC

What I see (LibO 4.2.2.1 on Win7) :
- the "revert" axis button is inoperant for the secondary axis,
- but, when operated for the first axis, it applies to the whole graph (secondary axis included).

So the demand turns to be :
- as is, the button is misleading,
- the "revert axis" feature should be local at axis level, not global at graph level.

IHMO it's the same for "Logarithmic scale".

Comment 3 A (Andy) 2014-05-29 11:42:32 UTC

reproducible with LO 4.2.4.2 (Win 8.1) and I would agree with the comments

Comment 4 QA Administrators 2016-02-21 08:36:03 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)

** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice
(5.0.5 or 5.1.0) https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and
your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave
a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not
appropriate in this case)

If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3)

http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword

Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa

Thank you for your help!

-- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2016-02-21

Comment 5 QA Administrators 2017-03-06 15:24:44 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)

** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice
(5.2.5 or 5.3.0 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and
your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave
a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System

Please DO NOT

If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3)

http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo";
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword

Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170306

Comment 6 Leyan 2020-12-16 22:03:01 UTC

Seems to work fine on LibreOffice 7.0.3.1. I was able to select reverse axis on the first axis and/or the second axis and the result was as expected in all cases, only the relevant axis was affected.