Summary: | Wrong placement of diacritics when setting color for each glyph | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | Hossein <hossein> |
Component: | Writer | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | khaled |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | Inherited From OOo | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
See Also: |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71956 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150726 |
||
Whiteboard: | |||
Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 71732, 112810 | ||
Attachments: | Writing Allah with colored glyphs, compared to the same text in black |
Description
Hossein
2022-08-31 15:59:59 UTC
There are lots of reports about partial formatting affecting kerning, glyph joining, mark positioning. They are all caused by the same underlying issue. They should all be duplicates of bug 61444. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 61444 *** It should be noted that: 1. Changing the color of the entire text to "automatic" removes some, but not all, of the differences in rendering. 2. Removing all direct formatting results in the word Allah with two shadda's rendered, one above and one below the superscript-aleef. Khaled, shall I file that as a separate bug? (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #2) > It should be noted that: > > 1. Changing the color of the entire text to "automatic" removes some, but > not all, of the differences in rendering. > > 2. Removing all direct formatting results in the word Allah with two > shadda's rendered, one above and one below the superscript-aleef. Khaled, > shall I file that as a separate bug? Screenshots please. |