Bug 105542

Summary:	First condition is not a good way to identify conditions in Manage Conditional Formatting(MCF)
Product:	LibreOffice	Reporter:	pajaro
Component:	Calc	Assignee:	Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs>
Status:	RESOLVED WONTFIX
Severity:	enhancement	CC:	ilmari.lauhakangas
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.3.0.2 rc
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
See Also:	https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107141
Whiteboard:
Crash report or crash signature:		Regression By:
Bug Depends on:
Bug Blocks:	87351

Description pajaro 2017-01-26 14:34:41 UTC

MCF only shows the first condition, which is insufficient to identify them. 

For example, I have several ColorScale on the same sheet. It only shows ColorScale

Either allow naming them, or show all the conditions or a third better option I cant think of :)

Comment 1 Buovjaga 2017-02-02 11:01:58 UTC

Yeah, I noticed this when testing a ColorScale report. Let's set to NEW.

Comment 2 Markus Mohrhard 2017-02-18 02:39:03 UTC

There is not a better solution. Just use the range to identify the format. The shown condition is just a helpful addition.

Comment 3 pajaro 2017-04-02 10:42:40 UTC

Please, could you reconsider adding a description field to the conditions?

When Having a few more conditions than normal in multiple parts is really a mess of a dialog

This coupled with the fact that when you copy/paste cells with CF, multiple new CF are added, subdividing new cell ranges, the dialog gets reaaally messy

This is really a hindrance for CF in general

Comment 4 Buovjaga 2017-04-13 10:50:34 UTC

(In reply to pajaro from comment #3)
> Please, could you reconsider adding a description field to the conditions?

You could create a new report and include a proposal of how it should look.

Comment 5 pajaro 2017-04-13 13:33:46 UTC

I created a mockup in #107141

Although I thought this wasnt necessary... due to being a disagreement on this being useful and not on how it could look like